Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic Church

Homily for November 11, 2007
Liturgical Year C - Cycle I
32nd Sunday in Ordinary Time
By Dcn. Ray Alcouffe
Topic:  Resurrection
+  +  +


“He is not God of the dead, but of the living, for to him, all are alive.”
 
Sometimes, when people read a good book, especially some kind of mystery, they jump to the back of the book to see what the ending is.  Then they go to the beginning and read about how the author got there.  That’s what we are doing when we think about the Resurrection of the Body.  Resurrection at the end of times, spoken of in the Bible, is about the state of our future life with God, known as the end of times, where all our enemies are defeated, even death, and we are risen again with Jesus, united with our body into a new creation, a new heaven and a new earth.  This is the perfect state of being for us as human beings, the kind of existence God wills as our destiny.  The question is how does this happen, how do we get there?  Well, now that we have a glimpse of the end of the story, we need to go back to the beginning and reconsider what that destiny means.  Not only that but we must also consider whether the way we live our lives matters as to the final outcome for us.
 
First of all, as we see from our readings, we are presented with two alternatives for life after death or immortality: either it exists or it does not.  In the Jewish context of the time, the Sadducees hold the second alternative - that there is no life after death - because the word of God, the Torah which is all they accept as God’s word, does not speak about such a life.  The only way a person can get a kind of immortality is through their children, and their children’s children, etc.  That’s what marriage is for.  This was tacitly behind the example they presented to Jesus where it was understood that they were talking about bodily resurrection and a resumption of our earthly relationships.  For them it is ridiculous to think that a resurrected woman could have 7 husbands, QED. 
 
The second alternative is that there is life after death, which leads to the final resurrection, is what Jesus is affirming.  He counters the Sadducees saying that upon resurrection, in our final state, our relationships are not going to be the same but will be perfected in the face of no more death.  Then Jesus says that when God spoke to Moses, an event recorded in the Torah, God speaks of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as alive. This talmudic argument leaves unsaid the punch line that Abraham et al. will be raised in the future.  So ends the argument, Jesus wins!  Amen.
 
In order to understand Jesus’ victory, we need to be aware that when Jesus and the Sadducees are speaking of resurrection, they are speaking of the final state of being for humans, the state of life after life-after-death. That is, the road to our everlasting life is a two-stage process after we die, life after death and then resurrection.  The final state, the Resurrection of the body, has been the hope of Israel even before Jesus as clearly demonstrated in 2 Maccabees by the woman and her 7 sons when they were ordered to disobey the commands of the Law and thus deny God.  They refused to do this and in their refusal they had to witness and undergo horrible torture and mutilation and then death. As it says of the third son: “He put out his tongue when ordered and bravely held out his hands as he spoke these noble words: ‘It was from heaven that I received these; for the sake of his laws I disdain them; from him I hope to receive them again.”  This is a clear statement of the hope that Israel held as God’s promise of resurrection of the body at the end of time.
 
In a way, there we have it.  In God’s view, we as humans undergo three stages of life - our present earthly life (body and soul), life after death (just soul?), and then resurrected life, body and soul, both perfected.  But in our popular culture, sometimes even our Catholic culture, we have much confusion when we think about resurrection.  We tend to equate resurrection with life in the hereafter, in the sweet by and by, pie in the sky, floating around in the clouds in a spiritual, disembodied state plucking our harps. Either that or, God forbid, we wind up in Hell.  This was not the resurrection that motivated the earliest Christians. This is not what Jesus’ resurrection was about.  Jesus attained the end state at his resurrection and that’s what was offered to all who chose to follow his way.  That’s what motivated them - they saw with their own eyes the destiny that had been the enduring hope of Israel; and with Christ, that destiny was now at hand.  The fullness of life, body and soul, with God in God’s dwelling place was now at hand. 
 
How did this view of life in God influence those early Christians? The same way it influences us who embrace this hope - a present life that is transformed as we contemplate our destiny.  As an example: Back in the Middle ages, a dispatcher went out to determine how laborers felt about their work.  He went to a building site in France.  He approached the first worker and asked, “What are you doing?”   “What, are you blind? I’m cutting these impossible boulders with primitive tools and putting them together the way the boss tells me. I’m sweating under this blazing sun.  It’s backbreaking work, and it’s boring me to death.” The dispatcher quickly backed off and retreated to a second worker.  He asked the same question, “What are you doing?”  The worker replied, “I’m shaping these boulders into usable forms, which are then assembled according to the architect’s plans. It’s hard work and sometimes it gets repetitive, but I earn 5 francs a week and that supports the wife and kids.  It’s a job. Could be worse.”  Somewhat encouraged, the dispatcher went on to a third worker, “And what are you doing?”
“Why, can’t you see?” said the worker as he lifted his arm to the sky, “I’m building a cathedral!” 
 
So how is it that we are living our life? As a toil?  As a job until something better comes?  Or are we building a cathedral, our destiny?  Because we are building our future, our destiny, by the way we live our lives whether we believe so or not.  That’s why God has given us a glimpse of our final destiny and why Jesus came to open it up to us.  Therefore, everything we do, think, desire in both body and soul does matter.  What our resurrected body will be like is influenced by how we use this body in the present life - consider Jesus’ resurrected body and how it still carries the marks of his enduring suffering and death for us.  That’s an important point because our own suffering in this life is something we’d dearly like to avoid. Yet as we build our future, our response to suffering is an essential part of the whole.  There are two kinds of suffering that are involved - one is redemptive suffering, i.e. suffering or the sake of others, like Jesus’ or like a parent for a child.  The second is a purifying suffering, suffering that we undergo and from which we can emerge for the better in our personal outlook.  It comes to us unbidden, unwanted and sometimes it is devastating.  But as we lift our suffering up in faith to the Lord, it becomes a purification for us.  Faith makes all the difference as to whether suffering will lift us up, purify us in the eyes of God, or whether it will weigh us down and cause us to despair which is the killer of hope.
 
We say in the Nicene Creed that: “We look for (hope) the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come.”  This is the hope that, once accepted, shapes our present lives giving everything we do ultimate meaning.  In this vein, there is a bit of spiritual wisdom that goes:
Sow a desire, reap a thought; sow a thought, reap an act; sow an act, reap a habit; sow a habit, reap a character; sow a character, reap a destiny.  Amen! 

We close with an encouragement that we just heard from St. Paul:
“May our Lord Jesus Christ himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us everlasting encouragement and good hope through his grace, encourage your hearts and strengthen them in every good deed and word.”